Bipin shantilal panchal v state of gujarat

Author: ctal

August undefined, 2024

WebMay 8, 2024 · Going against the mandate rendered in Bipin Shantilal Panchal, the bench held that the presiding officer of the court would now have to decide objections to … WebFeb 22, 2001 · Respondent (Dr. Bipin S. Panchal) was arrested on 8.11.1993 in connection with the aforesaid seizure of narcotic or psychotropic substance. It led to the unearthing of a further huge quantity of Mandrex tablets which, added with the earlier interception, is quantified at about 2000 Kgs. The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Ahmedabad filed …

Bipin Shantilal Panchal Vs. State of Gujarat and Anr.

WebFeb 22, 2001 · Respondent (Dr. Bipin S. Panchal) was arrested on 8.11.1993 in connection with the aforesaid seizure of narcotic or psychotropic substance. It led to the unearthing … WebMay 20, 2024 · The Amici Curiae pointed that the practice of recording answers to all questions regardless of objections to the questions, as was directed in matter titled as … china nuclear build up

Unstamped & Unregistered Documents and Collateral Purpose

WebJan 20, 2024 · Bipin Shantilal Panchal Vs State of Gujarat and Anr on 22 February, 2001. In this landmark judgment, Supreme Court of India had formulated the following procedure while questions are put to witness during cross-examination. Also, per 138 Evidence Act, ‘ Chief examination and cross-examination must relate to relevant facts, but cross ... WebOct 27, 2024 · On the nature of the cross examination permitted under Section 138 of the Evidence Act, the learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 4, 7 to 10 relied on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat, (2001) 3 SCC 1, Judgment and order dated 13.1.2024 passed by this Court in the case … china nuclear power

Law Web: Supreme court guidelines modifying practice of recording …

bipin+shantilal+panchal Indian Case Law Law CaseMine

Webreported as Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat & Anr.6 wherein the appellant was facing a trial for the offences under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances … WebApr 21, 2024 · It was pointed out by learned amici that the practice adopted predominantly in all trials is guided by the decision of this court in Bipin Shantilal Panchal v.State of Gujarat (2001) 3 SCC 1 with respect to objections regarding questions to be put to witnesses. This court had termed the practice of deciding the objections, immediately as … grainville school jersey addressWebAug 14, 2024 · However, it was observed by the Supreme Court in 2001 in Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat , AIR 2001 SC 1158, that that ‘it is an archaic practice that during the evidence collecting stage, whenever any objection is raised regarding admissibility of any material in evidence the court does not proceed further without … china nuclear icbm

"WebPratapbhai Hamirbhai Solanki v. State of Gujarat and Another .... 561 Public Union for Civil Liberties v. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors. .... 579 Purushottam Das Bangur & Ors. v. Dayanand ... Bipin Shantilal Panchal (Dr.) v. State of Gujarat 1996 (1) SCR 193 – distinguished .... 837 Brij Mohan Lal v. Union of India & Ors. (Brig Mohan Lal-I) 2002 ... " - Bipin shantilal panchal v state of gujarat

Bipin shantilal panchal v state of gujarat

Whether the court can permit cross examination of a person who …

WebAs the petitioner Bipin Panchal had approached the Apex Court against the order passed by this Court, he has agitated bail plea again before this Court and petitioner Achint … WebA latest precedent in this regard has been laid down in M/S SMS TEA ESTATES P.LTD v. M/S CHANDMARI TEA CO. P.LTD. (2011) 14 SCC 6 ... which could be decided at the later stage while hearing the case as guided by the Apex Court in Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat and Anr. (2001) 3 SCC 1.

Did you know?

WebJul 28, 2024 · Before issuing the Draft Rules, the Supreme Court in the present case analyzed the view taken by the Court in Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat, with regards to the process of cross-examination methods and objections related to the deposition of witnesses. WebSep 22, 2008 · "Bipin Shantilal Panchal, V/s State of Gujarat" 4 (2001) 3 SCC 1 is no...opinion 4 {5} wp4788-14 that the view in Bipin Panchal should not be considered as …

WebApr 20, 2024 · It was pointed out by learned amici that the practice adopted predominantly in all trials is guided by the decision of this court in Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat 4 with respect to objections regarding questions to be put to witnesses. Web1996(1) Supreme 279 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA A.M. Ahmadi, CJI, B.P. Jeevan Reddy & N.P. Singh, JJ. Dr. Bipin Shantilal Panchal -Appellant versus State of Gujarat …

WebMay 3, 2024 · In the case of Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat, (2001) 3 SCC 1, ... The Hon’ble Court considered the mandate of Bipin Shantilal (supra) and observed … WebIn the case of Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat, (2001) 3 SCC 1, practices with respect to objections regarding questions to be put to witnesses were enunciated and it was directed that the Court must record answers to all questions, regardless of objections. However, this may lead to prolonged and lengthy cross examination, and more ...

WebSep 7, 1998 · BIPIN SHANTILAL PANCHAL V. STATE OF GUJARAT reported in (2001) 3 S.C.C. 1, wherein it is held as follows: " When so recast, the practice which can be a better substitute...of oral evidence." 5. 5. Applying the above ratio laid down by the Apex Court in BIPIN SHANTILAL PANCHAL V. STATE OF GUJARAT reported in (2001) 3 S.C.C. 1, …

WebFeb 5, 2015 · Learned Advocate for the petitioner has relied upon the decision rendered by the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat and another reported in 2001 (3) GLR 2024, and submitted that in the said case, the Honourable Supreme Court has given a direction to the trial Court to make a note of … china nuclear power engineering companyWebFeb 22, 2001 · Respondent (Dr. Bipin S. Panchal) was arrested on 8.11.1993 in connection with the aforesaid seizure of narcotic or psychotropic substance. It led to the unearthing … china nuclear powered submarinesWebFeb 22, 2001 · No.223 of 2000. (From the Judgment and Order dated 29.10.1999 in Criminal Misc. Application No. 2898 of 1999 of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad) Petitioner: Bipin Shantilal Panchal. Respondent: State of Gujarat and Anr. Apeal: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.862 of 2001. china nuclear capabilityWebMay 3, 2024 · In the case of Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat, (2001) 3 SCC 1, ... The Hon’ble Court considered the mandate of Bipin Shantilal (supra) and observed that under Section 148 of the Indian … grain vinyl backpacksWebSaji Koduvath, Advocate, Kottayam. Courts adjudicate matters on the basis of and evidence before it. Such evidence must will relevant and admissible. Significance von Evidence Sec. 5 additionally 136 of the Evidence Act stipulate that evidence can be given only on ‘facts in issue’ alternatively ‘relevant facts’. Important facts are numeric in Second. 6 onwards.… china nuclear plantshttp://courtverdict.com/supreme-court-of-india/bipin-shantilal-panchal-vs-state-of-gujarat-and-anr china nuclear power plant leakWebNov 3, 2001 · The state of gujarat reported in 1997 (1) glh 799 and submitted that lie detection test is a scientific test and expert be allowed to depose and if any objection is raised, the same can be finalised as directed by the supreme court in bipin shantilal panchal's case (supra). grain vs granularity